Random Acts of Patriotism

12% of the colonists took sides against the British King in the Revolutionary War. 88% sat back and waited to see who would win, or took sides with the King and against the freedoms then given to free Englishmen by God and now given by God to free Americans. You have the chance to be one of the 12% or one of the 88%. Which will you be?

2010 Vote Fraud: What to Look For

Disingenuous denials aside, there is a lot of vote fraud going on this election cycle. If you are interested in stopping vote fraud instead of promoting it or pretending it doesn’t exist, read through this article by an attorney formerly with the US DOJ voting rights section.

Amplify’d from pajamasmedia.com

There’s been lots of talk about voter fraud this election season. Already machines have purportedly preselected candidates and in other places, documents demonstrate non-citizens are registered to vote. Anyone who says voter fraud doesn’t exist has no credibility. I’ve covered elections for over 10 years. I’ve seen it over and over again with my own eyes. I’ve proved it in federal court. It is significantly more common than Sasquatch.

But what does voter fraud look like? What can citizens be on the lookout for when they participate in their election? Let me share some examples:

Read more at pajamasmedia.com


Democrat Party Vote Thieves from 2008 are back in 2010

Hillbuzz is all over it. This is a good section, but really the whole article is worth reading.

Amplify’d from hillbuzz.org

If you have not seen it already, Rush, you need to watch Gigi Gaston’s documentary “We Will Not Be Silenced 2008″.  I’m featured in a segment on the voter fraud that was committed in the Iowa Caucus back in January of 2008.  While I was always aware Democrats use unions and other means to cheat in elections, I never knew the Democrat Party was capable of the large-scale, aggressive, unapologetic fraud it committed on Obama’s behalf all through 2008.  In Iowa, I watched Obama’s ACORN and SEIU goons push and shove old people, bully them, and intimidate them when they wanted to vote for Hillary Clinton.  I saw scores of Illinois license plates fill the parking lots outside caucus locations, with Chicagoland Obama supporters illegally entering the Caucus sites to vote for Obama and game Iowa for him.  Having planned ahead, Obama supporters actually RAN those caucus sites, and held the doors open for all these fraudulent voters to walk right in, without being asked for IDs, where they then took control of the caucuses and bullied the Iowa residents into supporting Obama — lest they be called RAAACISTS! out in the open in front of their friends and neighbors in those open-air caucuses.

The media has never talked about this.  I don’t remember ever hearing you talk about it.  But one of the biggest reasons the Democrats are in the trouble they’re in right now is because of how frequently the Left and the media (one and the same, really) called anyone who opposed Obama a RAAACIST.  If you supported Hillary Clinton in the primaries instead of Obama, you were called a RAAACIST.  If you were someone like me who fundraised for Hillary, who hosted events for her, who put yourself out there and wrote columns advocating her or did media spots talking up her candidacy, you were aggressively targeted by the Obama campaign and his supporters…relentlessly attacked as a RAAACIST! and assaulted with the Alinksy Rules for Radicals in hopes of breaking your spirit, terrorizing you, and making you abandon Clinton for fear of having these people destroy your life, ruin your business, and make you an absolute pariah in your community.

This is what the Obama campaign, the media, and the DNC did to DEMOCRATS.

Read more at hillbuzz.org


Union Official Caught on Tape Telling How He Stole Elections

Let’s keep hammering nails in the coffin of the Big Lie that nobody has ever actually cheated on a vote, especially not a Democrat cheating on a vote.

Why did Anita Hill really testify against Clarence Thomas?

A remarkable analysis of the facts of the case, including some that were covered up and obscured by the Senate committee, and incorporating back story about the movies students typically watched and talked about in law school in the 1970s. Summary, Anita Hill was provoked by promises of anonymity into testifying against Clarence Thomas, then faced with a choice between repudiating her testimony and destroying her own reputation or doubling down and dragging Clarence Thomas’s name through the mud. We know what she chose.

And we also know that in the end, her career after that testimony has not been exemplary while Thomas’s has.

Read the whole thing. My summary cannot do it justice.